Rutledge for Va Governor 2021 warns of Citi Groups and DNC BLM loans and consequences!

Rutledge for Virginia Governor says “Read the Contract and the details before jumping on racially directed DNC business loans!”

Remember it’s always your job to read contracts that you enter into and meet the conditions and terms. The DNC and their banks are now our community loan sharks. All of a sudden Citi group and other Never Trump Banks are trying to give out racially directed loans. Now this is a set up! This is the history of the Democratic Party. They give you money with super high interest rates during a recession. This means your ideas and wealth stands little chance in this type of hoax economy that you voted with Biden. This means for pennies on the dollar. The banks will take everything you own and use your own ideas as more wealth for banks. Instead of owning your business. They will own you and your business. China is right now steadily buying American businesses for pennies on the dollar. Under Virginia current leaders, expect this to happen to your business by the politicians a.k.a socialist vultures. That’s exactly what your business will sell for with these loan sharks – pennies on the dollar. I have no problem with interest rates and capitalism. I will support it fully. I rather the community to be the shark, not the bait. I do have a problem with the fact that you voted for Biden under another lie! At least, I’m willing to tell you the truth of the matter. For example: “You got a very good tasting cupcake factory. The economy causes your business to go belly up. You can then expect Walmart to have their name on your cupcake and you will be never mentioned as making it. Sounds like the history some thought was good to take away. Your idea and business will be taken away from you and your vote represents the precedence of your community wealth being wiped out for Walmart style monopolies. Most businesses can’t afford a DNC/ Biden economy of shut downs. The sad thing is too many voted for it. I will make sure in Virginia moving forward that we maintain our small businesses and that we build good credit, not unnecessary debt by continued poor DNC management and gimmicks! Remember President Trump gave the green light to Ice Cube platinum plan. Too bad no one took the time to find out what it was about before giving it up for hate of Trump. Not the love of your achievements and being driven by success.

Merle Rutledge for Virginia Governor 2021 – #MAGA
www.rutledgeforvagovernor.com

Read Full Post »

Merle Rutledge exposes Judge Stacey Moreau “Conflicts of Interest”

Merle Rutledge Jr exposes “secret Conflict of Interest” with Judge Stacey Moreau. Conflict of Interest not known to all parties from Judge Moreau’s ties to Law Firm that represented legal matters for…

• Posted by Merle T. Rutledge Jr on September 5, 2013 at 12:38am
• View Blog

Merle Rutledge Jr exposes “secret Conflict of Interest” with Judge Stacey Moreau. Conflict of Interest not known to all parties from Judge Moreau’s ties to Law Firm that represented legal matters for PIttsylvania County local government in 

Judge Moreau, current Circuit Judge for Pittsylvania County in Virginia, received her undergraduate degree from Randolph-Macon College. Her law degree was earned from the University of Richmond’s T.C. Williams School of Law where she met her husband, Charles Moreau, who also graduated from T.C. Williams. Both went to work in the law firm of Williams, Morrison, Light & Moreau owned by her father, Ronald W. Williams, Esq., also a T.C. Williams School of Law grad who served on Danville’s City Council as a member and mayor from 1970-77, and on the Pittsylvania County School Board from 1984-88.

John P. Light, former Pittsylvania County local government Attorney:
Danville, Virginia
Phone:
434-793-4912
Fax:
434-792-6110
Email:

For example, the duty to be respectful of others includes the
responsibility to avoid comment or behavior that can reasonably be interpreted as manifesting prejudice or bias towards
another on the basis of personal characteristics like race,
sex, religion, or national origin. Ms. Moreau called my case a police complaint, which means she decided the merits of the case without a trial. This shows the complete bias and impartiality of her decision in this case. The case dealt with police officers giving out tickets outside of jurisdiction, every Sunday, without a cooperation agreement. If founded to be true on the merits, would mean those tried and found guilty would have double jeopardy attached and fines from the court would have to go to those wronged, because those fines would have been giving out illegally. This would have been a financial set back to PIttsylvania County General District and Circuit Courts on July 22, 2013. These illegal stops happen in PIttsylvania County by Town of Chatham, Va police officers. It was a huge conflict of interest and appeared to try to keep funds fradulently collected and convictions from being properly dispose of in a corrective manner. Ms. Moreau had ersonal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning
the proceedings because of the work done by her father’s law firm with the PIttsylvania County local government. Ms. Moreau lawfirm had prior service as lawyer in matter in controversy: 

Generally, a judge may not hear the case if it involves a former client and the former representation, no matter how long ago the
representation ended. The law firm of Williams, Morrison, Light & Moreau owned by her Judge Moreau’s father. There was significant issues about a Town of Chatham, VA officer naming a General District Judge of Pittsylvania County General Court Jones as the judicial authorizationfor allowing the Town of Chatham, Va to enforce ordinances outside of their jurisdiction and all was issues presented in this case. Case Number CL13000010-00

Judge Moreau violated Ex Parte Communications in February
An ex parte communication occurs when there is an oral 
or written communication for which one or more parties did
not have notice and an opportunity to appear and participate.
The provisions of Va. Canon 3B(7) and Fed. Canon 3A(4) spell
out in much more detail than before when a judge may receive
an ex parte communication, and from whom—all other ex
parte communications are unethical. This provision is not just
an abstract theory of due process—it is designed to avoid 
creating a bias or prejudice in the judge and an appearance of
impropriety. In another hearing for a petition to revoke a business license that was already given to a business already operating in Town of Chatham,Va . The business owner name is Lafayette Hodnett and was operating his business for 2 months called H&C Pawn shop. His business license was revoked without even being given notice by mail or sheriff that a hearing was going on. The Town of Chatham Attorney and the judge decided to revoke the business license with a hearing before the court without the owners being present. Law scholars probably are cutting and pasting this research. Case Number:

 

Merle Rutledge Jr exposes “secret Conflict of Interest” with Judge Stacey Moreau. Conflict of Interest not known to all parties from Judge Moreau’s ties to Law Firm that represented legal matters for PIttsylvania County local government in 

Judge Moreau, current Circuit Judge for Pittsylvania County in Virginia, received her undergraduate degree from Randolph-Macon College. Her law degree was earned from the University of Richmond’s T.C. Williams School of Law where she met her husband, Charles Moreau, who also graduated from T.C. Williams. Both went to work in the law firm of Williams, Morrison, Light & Moreau owned by her father, Ronald W. Williams, Esq., also a T.C. Williams School of Law grad who served on Danville’s City Council as a member and mayor from 1970-77, and on the Pittsylvania County School Board from 1984-88.

John P. Light, former Pittsylvania County local government Attorney:
Danville, Virginia
Phone:
434-793-4912
Fax:
434-792-6110
Email:

For example, the duty to be respectful of others includes the
responsibility to avoid comment or behavior that can reasonably be interpreted as manifesting prejudice or bias towards
another on the basis of personal characteristics like race,
sex, religion, or national origin. Ms. Moreau called my case a police complaint, which means she decided the merits of the case without a trial. This shows the complete bias and impartiality of her decision in this case. The case dealt with police officers giving out tickets outside of jurisdiction, every Sunday, without a cooperation agreement. If founded to be true on the merits, would mean those tried and found guilty would have double jeopardy attached and fines from the court would have to go to those wronged, because those fines would have been giving out illegally. This would have been a financial set back to PIttsylvania County General District and Circuit Courts on July 22, 2013. These illegal stops happen in PIttsylvania County by Town of Chatham, Va police officers. It was a huge conflict of interest and appeared to try to keep funds fradulently collected and convictions from being properly dispose of in a corrective manner. Ms. Moreau had ersonal knowledge of disputed evidentiary facts concerning
the proceedings because of the work done by her father’s law firm with the PIttsylvania County local government. Ms. Moreau lawfirm had prior service as lawyer in matter in controversy: 

Generally, a judge may not hear the case if it involves a former client and the former representation, no matter how long ago the
representation ended. The law firm of Williams, Morrison, Light & Moreau owned by her Judge Moreau’s father. There was significant issues about a Town of Chatham, VA officer naming a General District Judge of Pittsylvania County General Court Jones as the judicial authorizationfor allowing the Town of Chatham, Va to enforce ordinances outside of their jurisdiction and all was issues presented in this case. Case Number CL13000010-00

Judge Moreau violated Ex Parte Communications in February
An ex parte communication occurs when there is an oral 
or written communication for which one or more parties did
not have notice and an opportunity to appear and participate.
The provisions of Va. Canon 3B(7) and Fed. Canon 3A(4) spell
out in much more detail than before when a judge may receive
an ex parte communication, and from whom—all other ex
parte communications are unethical. This provision is not just
an abstract theory of due process—it is designed to avoid 
creating a bias or prejudice in the judge and an appearance of
impropriety. In another hearing for a petition to revoke a business license that was already given to a business already operating in Town of Chatham,Va . The business owner name is Lafayette Hodnett and was operating his business for 2 months called H&C Pawn shop. His business license was revoked without even being given notice by mail or sheriff that a hearing was going on. The Town of Chatham Attorney and the judge decided to revoke the business license with a hearing before the court without the owners being present. Law scholars probably are cutting and pasting this research. Case

Number:

 

by Merle T. Rutledge Jr

Read Full Post »